Which is worse heart disease or cancer? I know, strange question.
But think on it a minute before you read further.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The reason I ask is, it would seem anyways, cancer is better. Don’t believe me? Look at all the sugar free, low fat diet foods. The components which make up those (not so tasty) “treats” are loaded with chemicals, most of which cause cancer.
Dying of cancer, or being treated for it, means you were passive in contracting cancer in the first place: you ate “right”, exercised, followed your doctor’s advice when she said “eliminate fat and sugar.” Cancer, therefore, can blindside you. Heart disease, on the other hand, meant you were a lazy fart who just sat around and ate fatty foods all day, didn’t exercise, and, therefore, you deserve to have a heart attack or some other form of heart disease.
But the biggest difference between the two? Money. That’s right. Money. Cancer treatments are *ex-PEN-sive*. It’s a billion dollar industry, cancer. Heart disease, while also a money maker, doesn’t bring in the cashola like cancer treatments: chemotherapy, radiation, long hospital stays, pills, pills, pills, doctors and more doctors, nurses, supplies (such as emesis basis to catch that vomit of yours), ambulance rides, etc.
Thing is, if I had to chose, I’d take heart disease. At least then I’d know I enjoyed my food in its original form, without chemicals, pesticides, or artificially flavored and grown. I don’t want cell growth going haywire, fed by chemicals I ingested willingly (or because that’s the food I could afford to buy) just to feed the “health care community.” No no, I don’t want to be pickled by artificial sweeteners, colors — such as Yello No. 5 — MSG, and a whole host of other yucks in our food.
Thanks to Kelly for prompting me to write this. There’s more in me about this, I just don’t have the attention to research it right now.